|
HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN RUSSIA AND POLAND
FROM THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER I UNTIL THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER III
by S.M. Dubnow
A Project Gutenberg EBook
3. THE PROBLEM OF EMIGRATION AND THE POGROM AT BALTA
In Russia itself a large number of emigration societies
came into being
about the same time, which had for their object the
transfer of Russian
Jews to the United States, the land of the free. The
organizers of these
societies evidently relied on some miraculous assistance
from the
outside, such as the _Alliance Israelite_ of Paris and
similar Jewish
bodies in Europe and America. Under the immediate effect
of Ignatyev's
statement to Dr. Orshanski in which the Russian Minister
referred to the
"Western frontier" as the only escape for the
Jews, the Russian-Jewish
press was flooded with reports from hundreds of cities,
particularly in
the South of Russia, telling of the formation, of
emigrant groups. "Our
poor classes have only one hope left to them, that of
leaving the
country. 'Emigration, America,' are the slogans of our
brethren"--this
phrase occurs at that time with stereotyped frequency in
all the reports
from the provinces.
Many Russian-Jewish intellectuals dreamed of establishing
Jewish
agricultural and farming colonies in the United States,
where some
batches of emigrants who had left during the year 1881
had already
managed to settle on the land. A part of the Jewish youth
was carried
away by the idea of settling in Palestine, and conducted
a vigorous
propaganda on behalf of this national idea among the
refugees from the
modern Egypt. There was urgent need of uniting these
emigration
societies scattered all over the Pale of Settlement and
of establishing
central emigration committees to regulate the movement
which had gripped
the people with elemental force.
Unfortunately, there was no unity of purpose among the
Jewish leaders in
Russia. The intellectuals who stood nearer to the people,
such as the
well-known oculist, Professor Mandelstamm, who enjoyed
great popularity
in Kiev, and others like him, as well as a section of the
Jewish press,
particularly the _Bazsvyet_, insisted continually on the
necessity of
organizing the emigration movement, which they regarded
as the most
important task confronting Russian Jewry at that time.
The Jewish
oligarchy in St. Petersburg, on the other hand, was
afraid lest such an
undertaking might expose it to the charge of
"disloyalty" and of a lack
of Russian patriotism. Others again, whose sentiments
were voiced by the
Russian-Jewish periodical _Voskhod_ and who were of a
more radical turn
of mind, looked upon the attempt to encourage a wholesale
emigration of
Jews as a concession to the Government of Ignatyev and as
an indirect
abandonment of the struggle for emancipation in Russia
itself.
In the spring of 1882, the question of organizing the
emigration
movement had become so pressing that it was decided to
convene a
conference of provincial Jewish leaders in St. Petersburg
to consider
the problem. Before the delegates had time to arrive in
the capital, the
sky of South Russia was once more lit up by a terrible
flare. Balta, a
large Jewish center in Podolia, where a Jewish emigration
society had
had sprung into being shortly before the catastrophe,
became the scene
of a frightful pogrom.
It was shortly before the Russian Passover, the high
season of pogroms,
when the Russian public was startled by a strange
announcement published
towards the end of March in the _Imperial Messenger_ to
the effect that
from now on it would accurately report all cases of
"Jewish disorders"
in accordance with the official information received from
the governors.
The announcement clearly implied that the Government knew
beforehand of
the imminence of new pogroms. Even the conservative
_Moscow News_
commented on the injudicious statement of the official
organ in emphatic
and sarcastic terms:
The _Imperial Messenger_ is comforting the public by
the
announcement that it would in due time and at due length
report all
cases of excesses perpetrated upon the Jews. One might
think that
these are every-day occurrences forming part of the
natural course
of events which demand nothing else than timely
communication to the
public. Is there indeed no means to put a stop to this
crying
scandal?
Events soon made it clear that there was no desire to put
a stop to this
"scandal," as the Moscow paper politely termed
the exploits of the
Russian robber bands. The local authorities of Balta were
forewarned in
time of the approaching pogroms. Beginning with the
middle of March the
people in Balta and the surrounding country were
discussing them openly.
When the Jews of that town made their apprehensions known
to the local
police commissioner, they received from him an evasive
reply. In view of
the fact that the Jewish population of Balta was three
times as large as
the Christian, it would not have been difficult for the
Jews to organize
some sort of self-defence. But they knew that such an
organization was
strictly forbidden by the Government, and, realizing the
consequences,
they had to confine themselves to a secret agreement
entered into by a
few families to stand up for one another in the hour of
distress. On the
second day of the Russian Easter, corresponding to the
seventh day of
the Jewish festival, on March 29, the pogrom began,
surpassing by the
savagery of the mob and the criminal conduct of the
authorities all the
bacchanalia of 1881. A contemporary observer, basing his
statements on
the results of a special investigation, gives the
following account of
the events at Balta:
At the beginning of the pogrom, the Jews got together
and forced a
band of rioters to draw back and seek shelter in the
building of the
fire department. But when the police and soldiers
appeared on the
scene, the rioters decided to leave their place of
refuge. Instead
of driving off the disorderly band, the police and
soldiers began to
beat the Jews with their rifle butts and swords. This
served as a
signal to start the pogrom. At that moment, somebody
sounded an
alarm bell, and, in response, the mob began to flock
together.
Fearing the numerical superiority of the Jews in that
part of the
town, the crowd passed across the bridge to the
so-called Turkish
side, where there were fewer Jews. The crowd was
accompanied by the
military commander, the police commissioner, the
burgomaster, and a
part of the local battalion, which fact, however, did
not prevent
the mob, while passing the Cathedral street, from
demolishing a
Jewish store and breaking the windows in the house of
another Jew, a
member of the town-council. After the mob had crossed
over to the
Turkish side, the authorities drew up military cordons
on all the
three bridges leading from that side to the rest of the
town, with
the order not to allow any Jews to pass. Needless to
say, the order
was carried out. At the same time the Christians of the
remaining
sections of the town and of the village of Alexandrovka
were allowed
to pass unhindered. Thanks to these arrangements, the
Turkish side
was sacked in the course of three to four hours, so
that by one
o'clock in the morning the rioters found nothing left
to do. During
the night, the police and military authorities arrested
twenty-four
rioters and a much larger number of Jews. The latter
were arrested
because they ventured to stay near their homes. The
following
morning, the Christians were released and allowed to
swell the ranks
of the pillaging mob, while the Jews were kept in jail
until the
following day and freed only when the governor arrived.
On the following day, March 30, at four o'clock in the
morning, a
large number of peasants, amounting to about five
thousand and armed
with clubs, began to arrive in town, having been
summoned by the
Ispravnik [1] from the adjacent villages. The arrival
of the
peasants was welcomed by the Jews, who thought that
they had been
called to come to their aid. But they soon found out
their mistake,
for the peasants declared that they had come to beat
and plunder the
Jews. Simultaneously with the arrival of the peasants,
large numbers
from among the local mob began to assemble around the
Cathedral, and
at eight o'clock in the morning signals were given to
renew the
pogrom. At first this was prevented. The officers of
the local
battalion, who patrolled the city, ordered the soldiers
to surround
the mob and hold it off for about an hour, during which
time the
Greek-Orthodox bishop [2] Radzionovski admonished the
rioters and
tried to make them understand that such doings were
contrary to the
laws of the Church and the State. But when the police
commissioner,
the military chief, and Ispravnik arrived before the
Cathedral, the
military cordon was withdrawn, and the crowd, now let
loose, threw
itself upon a near-by liquor store, and, after
demolishing it and
filling itself with alcohol, resumed its work of
destruction, with
the co-operation of the peasants who had been summoned
by the
Ispraynik and the assistance of the soldiers and
policemen. It was
on this occasion that those wild, savage scenes of
murder, rapine,
and plunder took place, the account of which as
published in the
newspapers is but the pale shadow of the real facts....
The pogrom
of Balta was called forth not by the mere inactivity
but by the
direct activity of the local authorities.
[Footnote 1: The head of the district (or county) police.
The police
in the larger towns of the county is subject to the
police
commissioner of the town, who is referred to earlier in
the text.]
[Footnote 2: In Russian, _Protoyerey_, a term borrowed
from the
Greek. It corresponds roughly to the title of bishop.]
What these "savage scenes" were we do not learn
from the newspapers,
which were forbidden by the censor to report them, but we
know them
partly from unpublished sources and partly from the later
court
proceedings. Aside from the demolition of twelve hundred
and fifty
houses and business places and the destruction and
pillage of property
and merchandise--according to a statement of the local
rabbi, "all
well-to-do Jews were turned into beggars, and more than
fifteen thousand
people were sent out into the wide world "--a large
number of people
were killed and maimed, and many women were violated.
Forty Jews were
slain or dangerously wounded; one hundred and seventy
received slight
wounds; many Jews, and particularly Jewesses, became
insane from fright.
There were more than twenty cases of rape. The seventeen
year old
daughter of a poor polisher, Eda Maliss by name, was
attacked by a horde
of bestial lads before the eyes of her brother. When the
mother of the
unfortunate girl ran into the street and called to her
aid a policeman
who was standing near-by, the latter followed the woman
into the house,
and then, instead of helping her, dishonored her on the
spot. The
fiendish hordes invaded the home of Baruch Shlakhovski,
and began their
bloody work by slaying the master of the house, whereupon
his wife and
daughter fled and hid themselves in a near-by orchard.
Here a Russian
neighbor lured them into his house under the pretext of
defending their
honor against the rioters, but, once in his house, he
disgraced the
daughter in the presence of her mother. In many cases the
soldiers of
the local garrison assaulted and beat the Jews who showed
themselves on
the streets while the "military operations" of
the mob were going on. In
accordance with the customary pogrom ritual, the human
fiends were left
undisturbed for two days, and only on the third day were
troops summoned
from a near-by city to put a stop to the atrocities.
On the same day the governor of Podolia arrived to make
an
investigation. It was soon learned that the local
authorities, the
police commissioner, the Ispravnik, the military
commander, the
burgomaster, and the president of the nobility [1] had
either directly or
indirectly abetted the pogrom. Many rioters, who had been
arrested by
the police, were soon released, because they threatened
otherwise to
point out to the higher authorities the ringleaders from
among the local
officials and the representatives of Russian society. The
Jews, again,
were constantly terrorized by these scoundrels and cowed
by the fear of
massacres and complete annihilation, in case they dared
to expose their
hangmen before the courts.
[Footnote 1: The nobility of each government forms an
organization of
its own. It is headed by a president for the entire
government who has
under his jurisdiction a president for each district (or
county). Such a
county president is referred to in the text.]
The pogrom of Balta found but a feeble echo in the
immediate
neighborhood--in a few localities of the governments of
Podolia and
Kherson. It seemed as if the energy of destruction and
savagery had
spent itself in the exploits at Balta. On the whole, the
pogrom campaign
conducted in the spring of 1882 covered but an
insignificant territory
when compared with the pogrom enterprise of 1881, though
surpassing it considerably in point of quality. The
horrors of Balta
were a substantial earnest of the Kishinev atrocities of
1903
and the October pogroms of 1905.
Go to page:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|