|
HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN RUSSIA AND POLAND
FROM THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER I UNTIL THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER III
by S.M. Dubnow
A Project Gutenberg EBook
CHAPTER XXIV
LEGISLATIVE POGROMS
1. THE "TEMPORARY RULES" OF MAY 3, 1882
During the interval between the pogrom of Warsaw and that
of Balta the
Government was preparing for the Jews a series of
legislative pogroms.
In the recesses of the Russian Government offices, which
served as the
laboratories of police barbarism, the authorities were
busy forging a
chain of legal and administrative restrictions in order
to "regulate"
Jewish life in the spirit of complete civil
disfranchisement. The
Central Committee on Jewish Affairs, attached to the
Ministry of the
Interior, which was called for short "the Jewish
Committee" but might
far more appropriately have been called "the
Anti-Jewish Committee," was
basing its labors upon the opinions submitted by the
gubernatorial
commissions and rearing on this foundation a monstrous
structure of
disabilities.
The new project was based upon the following theory: The
old Russian
legislation was marked by its hostility to the Jews as a
secluded group
of alien faith and race. A departure from this attitude
was attempted
during the reign of Alexander II., when the rights of
certain categories
of Jews were enlarged, and "a period of toleration
was inaugurated." But
subsequent experience proved the inexpediency of this
tolerant attitude
towards the Jews, as has been demonstrated by the recent
manifestation
"of an anti-Jewish movement abroad" (German
anti-Semitism) and "the
popular protest" in Russia itself, where it assumed
the form of pogroms.
Since Russia has now chosen the path of a "national
policy," it follows
also in regard to the Jewish question that this country
cannot but "turn
to its ancient tradition, throw aside the innovations
which have proved
useless, and follow vigorously the principles, evolved by
the whole past
history of the monarchy, according to which the Jews must
be regarded as
aliens," and therefore can lay no claim to full
toleration.
This barbarous theory, which brought Russia back to the
traditions of
ancient Muscovy, was expounded elaborately in the protocol
of the
session of the "anti-Jewish Committee," as a
sort of preamble to the
legal project submitted by it.
While engaged in these labors, the members of the
committee received the
news of the pogrom in Warsaw, and were greatly heartened
by it. They did
not fail to make an entry in the protocol to the effect
that the
"disorders" which had taken place in the
Kingdom of Poland "where the
Jews enjoy equal rights" (i.e., the right of
residence) tend to support
the theory of the "injuriousness" of the Jewish
people. Official pens
began to scribble more rapidly, and within a short time,
by the spring
of 1882, a project was ready, to be inflicted as a severe
punishment
upon the Jews for the atrocities perpetrated upon them.
The "conquered
foe," represented by the Jewish population, was to
be dislodged from a
large area within, the Pale of Settlement, overcrowded
though the latter
had become, by forbidding the Jews to settle anew outside
of the cities
and towns, i.e., in the country-side. Those already
settled there were
either to be evicted by the verdict of the rural
communes[1], or to be
deprived of a livelihood by the prohibition to buy or
lease immovable
property and to trade in liquor.
[Footnote 1: "To allow the communes to evict the
Jews by a verdict,"
according to the exact wording of the law.]
This project was submitted by Ignatyev to the Committee
of Ministers,
accompanied by the suggestion that the new disabilities
be enacted not
in due legal procedure (by the Council of State) but in
the form of
"Temporary Rules" to be sanctioned in an
extra-legal way by the Tzar,
with the end in view "to do away with the aggravated
relations between
the Jews and the original population."
However, even the members of the reactionary Committee of
Ministers were
embarrassed by Ignatyev's project. The Committee felt
that it was
impossible to carry out the expropriation of personal and
property
rights on so extensive a scale without the due process of
law and that
the permission to be granted to rural communes of
expelling the Jews
from the villages was tantamount to leaving the latter to
the tender
mercies of the benighted Russian masses, which would thus
more than ever
be strengthened, in their conviction that the Jews might
be expelled and
assaulted with impunity, so that the relations between
the two elements
of the population, instead of improving, would only
become more
aggravated. On the other hand, the Committee of Ministers
went on record
that it considered it necessary to adopt rigorous
measures against the
Jews in order that the peasants should not think
"that the Tzar's will
in ridding them of Jewish exploitation was not put into
execution."
As a result of these contentions, several concessions
were made by
Ignatyev, and the following compromise was reached: The
clause ordering
the expulsion of the hundreds of thousands of Jews
already settled in
the villages was eliminated, and the prohibition was
restricted to the
Jews who wished to settle outside of the towns and
townlets _anew_. In
turn, the Committee of Ministers yielded to Ignatyev's
demand that the
project should be enacted with every possible dispatch,
without
preliminary submission to the Council of State.
Such was the genesis of the famous "Temporary
Rules" which were
sanctioned by the Tzar on May 3, 1882. Shorn of all
bureaucratic
rhetoric, the new laws may be reduced to the following
laconic
provisions:
_First_, to forbid the Jews henceforth to settle anew
outside of the
towns and townlets.
_Second_, to suspend the completion of instruments of
purchase of
real property and merchandise in the name of Jews
outside of the
towns and townlets.
_Third_, to forbid the Jews to carry on business on
Sundays and
Christian holidays.
The first two "Rules" contained in their
harmless wording a cruel
punitive law which dislodged the Jews from nine-tenths of
the territory
hitherto accessible to them, and tended to coop up
millions of human
beings within the suffocating confines of the towns and
townlets of the
Western region. And yet, notwithstanding its tremendous
implications,
the law was passed outside the ordinary course of legal
procedure--under
the disguise of "Temporary Rules," which, in
spite of their title, have
been enforced with merciless cruelty for more than a
generation.
Go to page:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|