|
HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN RUSSIA AND POLAND
FROM THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER I UNTIL THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER III
by S.M. Dubnow
A Project Gutenberg EBook
CHAPTER XXVIII
JUDAEOPHOBIA TRIUMPHANT
1. INTENSIFIED REACTION
The poisonous Judaeophobia bacilli seemed to thrive more
than ever in
the highest Government circles of St. Petersburg.
However, not only the
hatred against the Jews but also the fury of general
political reaction
became more rabid than ever after the "miraculous
escape" of the
imperial family in the railroad accident near Borki on
October 17, 1888.
[1] Amidst the ecclesiastic and mystic haze with which
Pobyedonostzev
and his associates managed to veil this episode the
conviction became
deeply ingrained in the mind of the Tzar that it was the
finger of God
which pointed to him the way in which Russia might be
saved from
"Western" reforms and brought back into the
fold of traditional Russian
orthodoxy. This conviction of Alexander III. led to the
counter-reforms
which marked the concluding years of his reign, having
for their purpose
the strengthening of the police and Church regime in
Russia, such as the
curtailment of rural and urban self-government, the
increase of the
power of the nobility and clergy, the institution of
Zemstvo chiefs, [2]
and the multiplication of Greek-Orthodox parochial
schools at the
expense of secular schools. The same influences also
stimulated the
luxurious growth of Judaeophobia which from now on
assumed in the
highest Government circles a most malignant character. A
manifestation
of this frame of mind may be found in the words of the
Tzar which he
penned on the margin of a report submitted to him in 1890
by a high
official, describing the sufferings of the Jews and
pleading for the
necessity of stopping the policy of oppression:
"_But we must not forget
that it was the Jews who crucified our Lord and spilled
his priceless
blood_." Representatives of the court clergy
publicly preached that a
Christian ought not to cultivate friendly relations with
a Jew, since it
was the command of the gospel "to hate the murderers
of the Savior." The
Ministry of the Interior, under the direction of two
fanatic
reactionaries, Durnovo and Plehve, [3] set on foot all
the inquisitorial
contrivances of the Police Department, of which both
these officials had
formerly been the chiefs.
[Footnote 1: Borki is a village in the government of
Kherson. Of the
fifteen cars of the imperial train only five remained
intact.
Fifty-eight persons were injured, twenty-one fatally. The
members of the
imperial family were saved, although their car had been completely
wrecked.
The following quotation from Harold Frederic, _The New
Exodus_, p. 168
et seq., is of interest in this connection: "It was
reported about that
the Tzar regarded the escape alive of himself and family
from the
terrible railway accident at Borki as the direct and
miraculous
intervention of Providence. The facts were that the
imperial train was
being driven at the rate of ninety versts an hour over a
road calculated
to withstand at the utmost a speed of thirty-five versts;
that the
engineer humbly warned the Tzar of the danger, and was
gruffly ordered
to go still faster if possible, and that the miracle
would have been the
avoidance of calamity."]
[Footnote 2: On the Zemstvos compare p. 173, n. 1. The
reactionary law
of June 12, 1890 (see later, p. 358 et seq.) puts in
place of the
executives formerly elected by the people the
"Zemstvo chiefs,"
officials appointed from among the landed proprietors.]
[Footnote 3: Durnovo became Minister of the Interior in
1889, after the
demise of Tolstoi; Plehve was assistant-minister.]
The press was either tamed or used as a tool of the
governmental
policies. The most widely read press organs of the
capital, with the
exception of the moderately liberal _Novosti_ ("The
News") which managed
to survive the shipwreck of the liberal press, became
either openly or
secretly the official mouthpieces of the Government. The
venal _Novoye
Vremya,_ which the Russian satirist Shchedrin had branded
as "the
sewer," embarked, towards the end of the eighties,
on the noble
enterprise of hunting down the Jews with a zeal which was
clear evidence
of a higher demand for Judaeophobia in the official
world. There was no
accusation, however hideous, which Suvorin's paper,
steered
simultaneously by the Holy Synod and by the Police
Department, failed to
hurl in the face of the Jews. As an organ generally
reflecting the views
of the Government, the _Novoye Vremya_ served at that
time as a source
of political information for all dignitaries and officials.
The
ministers, governors and the vast army of subordinate
officials, who
wished to ascertain the political course at a given
moment, consulted
this "well-informed" daily, which, as far as
the Jewish question was
concerned, pursued but one aim: to make the life of the
Jews in Russia
unbearable. Apart from the _Novoye Vremya_, which was
read by the Tzar
himself, the work of Jew-baiting was also carried on with
considerable
zeal by the Russian weekly _Grazhdanin_ ("The
Citizen"), whose editor,
Count Meshcherski, enjoyed not only the personal favor of
Alexander III.
but also a substantial Government subsidy. These
metropolitan organs of
publicity gave the tone to the whole official and
semi-official press in
the provinces, and the public opinion of Russia was
systematically
poisoned by the venom of Judaeophobia.
When the Pahlen Commission was discharged, the Tzar
having "attached
himself to the opinion of the minority," [1] the
Government had no
difficulty in finding a few kind-hearted officials who
were eager to
carry the project framed by this reactionary minority
into effect. The
project itself, which had been elaborated in the Ministry
of the
Interior under the direction of Plehve, the sinister
Chief of Police,
was guarded with great secrecy, as if it concerned a plan
of military
operations against a belligerent Power. But the secret
leaked out very
soon. The Minister had sent out copies of the project to
the
governors-general, soliciting their opinions, and ere
long copies of the
project were circulating in London, Paris, and Vienna. In
the spring of
1890, Russia and Western Europe were filled with alarming
rumors
concerning an enactment of some "forty
clauses," which was designed to
curtail the commercial activities of the Jews, to
increase the rigor of
the "Temporary Rules" within the Pale, and
restrict the privileges
conferred upon several categories of Jews outside of it,
to establish
medieval Jewish ghettos in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and
Kiev, and similar
measures. The foreign press made a terrible outcry
against these
contemplated new acts of barbarism.
[Footnote 1: See p. 370.]
The voice of protest was particularly strong in England.
The London
_Times_ assailed in violent terms the reactionary
policies of Russia,
and a special organ, called _Darkest Russia_, was
published for this
purpose by Russian political refugees in England. The
Russian Government
denied these rumors through its diplomatic channels,
though at the very
same time the well-informed _Novoye Vremya_ and
_Grazhdanin_ were not
barred from printing news items concerning the projected
disabilities or
from recommending ferocious measures against the Jews for
the purpose
"of removing them from all branches of labor."
This comedy was well understood abroad. At the end of
July and in the
beginning of August interpellations were introduced in
both Houses of
the English Parliament, as to whether Her Majesty's
Government found it
possible to make diplomatic representations in defence of
the persecuted
Russian Jews for whom England would have to provide, were
they to arrive
there in large masses. Premier Salisbury, in the House of
Lords, and
Fergusson, the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs, in the
House of Commons, replied that "these proceedings,
which, if rightly
reported to us, are deeply to be regretted, concern the
internal affairs
of the Russian Empire, and do not admit of any
interference on the part
of Her Majesty's Government." [1] When shortly
afterwards preparations
were set on foot for calling a protest meeting in London,
the Russian
Government hastened to announce through the British
ambassador in St.
Petersburg that no new measures against the Jews were in
contemplation,
and the meeting was called off. Rumor had it that the
Lord Mayor of
London, Henry Isaacs, who was a Jew, did not approve of
this meeting,
over which, according to the English custom, he would
have to preside.
The action of the Lord Mayor may have been
"tactful," but is was
certainly not free from an admixture of timidity.
[Footnote 1: See _The Jewish Chronicle_ of August 8,
1890, p. 18b.]
Go to page:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|